“The Words of Worlds Series”
A blog dedicated to anything and everything related to the Worlds Schools circuit.
“Gene-Editing, Nuclear Energy, Art…Oh My!”: Analyzing More of the Texas 1st Semester Topics.
World Schools Debate: A Fusion of Forensics
Reveling in rhetoric: How speakers can savor style in World Schools
Team USA Wins The 2023 Greenhill Invitational
The World of Debating Beyond World Schools
The Results Are In: Flower Mound wins the 2023 Grapevine Classic!
TFA Announces 2023-2024’s Team Texas Lineup
Tackling the TX Season Opener Motions: Citizen Journalism, Vouchers, Judiciaries, and Palau
Breaking the Mold: Reevaluating the Need for a Third Substantive Argument
Whether it’s during the stressful hour before an impromptu round or while writing cases weeks in advance for a prepared round, most World Schools debaters are quite accustomed to racking their brains for a third argument. Various ideas float around but are ultimately rejected because the warranting is too similar to the first two arguments. This then begs the question: Are third substantive arguments truly necessary in World Schools Debate?
The National Speech & Debate Association Announces the 2023-2024 National Team
To be or not to be the chameleon: The benefits of being versatile in speeches rather than specializing
“A pile of gibberish.
If I had to sum up how my first speech ever went, that would be exactly what I would say. I sounded out incoherent words with my tongue. As I closed out my speech, I peered at my stopwatch.
I had 1 minute and 38 seconds to spare. It was like belly flopping into a swimming pool without knowing how to swim. But, the great thing about starting from nowhere is that you have the potential to get anywhere.
So, I braced myself and jumped into that pool. Again. And again. And again.”
The Case for World Schools Debate & The WoW Institute
If World Schools is truly about the global citizen, why do we have so many financial and social barriers when it comes to achieving success in it?